Amanda knox summary of trial

The young mother raised suspicions with her behavior after the disappearance of her daughter, Caylee, though prosecutors were unable to conclusively tie her to the toddler's death. Though authorities never put the pieces together to find the missing Alabama teen, Joran van der Sloot remains a prime suspect. Peterson was declared guilty of the crimes in , but in , his death sentence was overturned, setting the stage for a never-ending legal saga.

The Utah teen endured rape and other atrocities by a husband-wife team that held her captive for nine months. From Gacy's first sexual assault conviction to his eventual execution, here are the key moments from one of the most notorious murder sprees in U.

The Colorado father killed his family in August and confessed just days later. Dennis Rader tormented his Kansas community with a string of murders and taunted the police who couldn't solve his crimes, but blew his own cover through an insatiable desire for attention. The intelligent, engaging law student murdered at least 20 women in a spree that spanned the country until his arrest in Questions still remain about Lee's murder, as ex-boyfriend Syed continues to serve a life sentence, and the case receiving mass attention from the podcast, 'Serial.

September 20, Knox moves into her Perugia cottage The cottage, already occupied by Kercher and two Italian women in the upstairs apartment and four male students in the one below , is said to be in a " bad neighborhood ," with drug dealers lingering at the nearby basketball court. By Tim Ott. By Rachel Chang. The prosecution argued that the rock was actually thrown through the window from inside the villa as part of an attempt to make the murder appear to be the result of a robbery.

Four witnesses including two officers of the State Police, testified that the glass from the broken window was on top of the displaced items indicating that the room had been ransacked prior to the window being broken, while valuables in plain sight were not touched. They also suggested that the rock selected to break the window was illogical both because of the size and weight. According to forensic experts, the knife inflicting the mortal wound almost certainly was thrust with considerable force into the throat to the full depth of the blade.

The killer then pulled the knife upward with maximum force increasing the length of the gaping wound. Any alleged activity of cleaning is clearly contradicted by the findings of the trial. Concerning the alleged bloody footprints, all of them were tested with TMB and all of them returned negative.

Stefanoni herself acknowledged at the preliminary hearing on October 4, , that while TMB may give false positives, a negative result gives absolute certainty about the absence of blood.

In this case, the TMB test having been negative, the mandatory conclusion is that there was no blood associated with those footprints.

The superposition of DNAs can be due to the superposition in different times of footprints by those who lived there. At any rate, if there had been a cleaning activity, the traces on the bathmat would have been erased or even better the whole bathmat would have disappeared. The sincerity of the alibi told by Knox is manifest, while the opposite deductions of the Court of Appeal of Florence are marred by factual errors and lack of reasoning. The Florence Court also erred in considering unproven that Curatolo could have been a notoriety-driven witness: he testified in two other murder cases well known in Perugia and stepped forward with the authorities at the suggestion of a young Perugian journalist about one year after the murder.

According to the challenged ruling page Inspector Volturno did not ask Quintavalle if he had seen Sollecito or Knox immediately after the murder, while according to his testimony on March 13, , he had testified he had asked to those in the shop if they had seen the defendants in the days immediately before or after the murder getting a negative answer.

All of these statements make use of the content of statements whose use has been declared inadmissible by the Supreme Court already in April , hence the Florence Court openly admits using against Knox documentary evidence the Supreme Court had ruled being totally inadmissible for use against its author 1.

If at 5. Memorial, which, at any rate, is a confused document, self-contradictory and expression of desperation, not representative of the real events. By introducing in the present proceedings the definitive ruling against Rudy Guede, the elements on which it is based have themselves being introduced, albeit indirectly, in the trial against Knox and Sollecito.

Such elements enter the trial against Knox and Sollecito as the product of a proceeding where they were not represented. This goes against article of the Italian Constitution [and also against the Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States]. The defense demanded him to be heard and cross-examined during the Florence trial but the Court did not give any answer to this request.

This is a manifest violation of article of the Italian Constitution, since the defendants have the right to cross-examine personally or through their lawyers those who are accusing them, and if those accusing them evade cross-examination, article provides that their statements must not be used as evidence. The ruling alleges page 81 the absence of traces that can be referred to Knox, then on page it lists more than 30 exhibits testifying her presence at the cottage.

The Police made more inspections at the cottage between November 2 and December 18, , than the two acknowledged by the ruling. Knox and Sollecito, an Italian computer science graduate who studied at the local University of Perugia, had only been dating for a week at the time.

They had met at a classical musical concert Oct. Witnesses on the morning of Nov. Knox and Sollecito were questioned by police three days after the discovery of Kercher's body. During her interrogation, Knox made a statement in which she admitted to being in the apartment during the murder and falsely implicated Patrick Lumumba, the owner of a bar where Knox worked part-time.

Knox and Lumumba had been in contact on the evening of Nov. Knox later retracted the confession, stating that it had been forced out of her after hours of relentless and threatening interrogation by police in Italian, without a lawyer present. Knox and Sollecito were taken into custody, and in July , Italian prosecutors formally charged them with murder.

Following a lengthy and feverishly publicized trial, both were found guilty in December and sentenced to more than 20 years each. Leading the case against Knox and Sollecito was Giuliano Mignini, who has since become a controversial—and convicted—figure in his own right.

Mignini had been charged with abuse of office in , for allegedly wiretapping phones during his investigation of the renowned Monster of Florence case. He was found guilty in but the conviction was later overturned. Mignini's conduct throughout the investigation of Kercher's murder was widely criticized.

Many of the most bizarre theories about Knox's motive—including the idea that she was "demonic" —originated with Mignini. Following Knox and Sollecito's acquittals in , Mignini was disciplined by the Italian Council of Magistrates for violation of correct procedure in the case.

One question that still gets asked with surprising frequency is "if Amanda Knox didn't do it, who did? Here's just some of the evidence against Guede: He admitted he was in Kercher's room on the night of her murder. His DNA was found on and inside Kercher's body, and on her purse. His bloodstained fingerprints were found on her bedding. He initially said that Knox was not at the apartment on the night Meredith died and later changed his story to incriminate her.

Guede was tried separately from Knox and Sollecito in a "fast-track" process, and was found guilty of murder and sexual assault in